We have submitted our concerns about air quality in the consultation “Improving air quality: national plan for tackling nitrogen dioxide in our towns and cities”.
We are very dissatisfied with DEFRA’s (Department of the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs) proposed measures to address the problem:
- We do not accept that devolution of responsibility for air quality to local planning authorities is an appropriate way forward. Local authorities lack the resources, capacity and expertise to shoulder the responsibility.
- We are concerned that each local planning authority will act in isolation with regard to air quality. The government is committed to delivering 1 million new homes by 2020, and it is clear that the adverse air quality impacts of increased traffic, increased congestion and air pollution in pinch-points, will be experienced across more than one planning authority area and we are aware of no overarching strategy that can address this.
- Within Kent, we are particularly concerned at the conflict between the requirement for air quality improvement and policies and decisions on transport. Kent’s channel corridors provide for the movement of some 60% of freight between the UK and mainland Europe. Kent County Council’s Freight Action Plan seeks to facilitate increased traffic, rather than engage in sustainable freight movement strategies which reduce the nation’s reliance on this route. The Port of Dover’s expansion plans will have concomitant impact on the highways network further afield, not least at the existing Dartford Crossings. It is because of the congestion, delays and exceedance of air quality limit values that already exist at Dartford that DfT recently announced a third Thames Crossing to be sited east of Gravesend. However, Highways England have acknowledged that the construction of this crossing would be expected to divert only 14% of the traffic using Dartford to the new crossing at Gravesend; it will not resolve the existing problems at Dartford, but it will create new problems at Gravesend.
CPRE Kent Director Hilary Newport said: “For all of these reasons, and many more, we find it implausible that a national air quality strategy which focuses on simply forcing responsibility, but not capability, to deliver air quality improvements can possibly achieve the outcomes required by the Supreme Court.”
To read the full submission click here.
Meanwhile our Canterbury committee has also responded to the consultation raising issues specific to the city.
Barrie Gore said: “Canterbury basically sits in a bowl on the floodplain of the River Stour with higher land around, so that when cloud cover is low, or during conditions of extreme heat, traffic fumes are unable to dissipate and the City suffers from even worse pollution than usual. Geological situations should always be taken into account where they worsen existing bad pollution. Such areas will often have medieval street plans, like Canterbury, which trap fumes more than modern, wider, roads, which also may adversely affect the fabric of historic buildings and World Heritage Sites.”
He also referred to the Canterbury Local Plan and the huge level of development planned which will make things much worse with 25000 (twenty-five thousand) vehicle movements in the city on a daily basis. and which would increase Canterbury’s population by at least 25%.
To read the Canterbury submission click here.
June 14th 2017, updated June 19th.